A freight forwarder’s case: the shipments were ordinary, and the sanctions check was in the wrong place.
What happened
Between November 2018 and February 2022, OFAC says, five foreign subsidiaries of C.H. Robinson brokered or carried 82 shipments involving Iran, or Iranian- or Cuban-origin goods, or an Iranian airline. Foreign subsidiaries of US companies can be caught by the Iran and Cuba regulations.
- China. A shipment from China to Turkey in September 2021 showed on its air waybill the first carrier as “W5”, the code for Mahan Airlines, and the first destination as Tehran. Staff reviewed the waybill and did not recognise either.
- Spain. A subsidiary acquired in February 2019 sent textile-machinery spare parts to Iran in March 2019, using its own export system, which the parent could not yet see.
- Canada. 71 shipments to Canada of Iranian- or Cuban-origin goods, worth $448,731, mainly consumer items.
- Australia. Eight customs-broker entries for Iranian-origin goods worth $148,196.
- Peru. One export to Iran worth $74,919 in December 2019, which OFAC says an employee arranged by circumventing internal processes. The employee has left.
Why
The release says the “vast majority” happened because the subsidiaries’ systems had not yet been integrated into the parent’s, which had sanctions checks built in. The subsidiaries were bought between 2016 and 2019 and kept their own systems until at least 2022. The parent’s export compliance team found the shipments in routine sample audits in 2022.
The penalty
Voluntarily self-disclosed and non-egregious, so the base was half the transaction value, $322,112, and the settlement was $257,690. OFAC still listed as aggravating that the conduct continued up to 4.5 years after acquisition and that the shipment documents showing Iranian or Cuban origin were available throughout.
What the record shows
- Integration is a sanctions control. The gap was the time between buying a business and connecting it to the checks.
- The information was on the paperwork. An air waybill named an Iranian airline and Tehran.
See professional enablers and the Toll Holdings case.