The goods never touched the United States. The invoices did, in the form of dollar wires.
The sales
PT Bukit Muria Jaya (BMJ), an Indonesian paper-products maker, exported cigarette paper worth about $959,000 to entities in or acting for North Korea. Some went to an intermediary in China that bought on behalf of Korea Daesong General Trading Corporation, which OFAC had designated in 2010 as controlled by Office 39 of the Korean Workers’ Party. Daesong was operating under an alias.
The paperwork
BMJ’s sales documents first named DPRK entities. At customers’ request, BMJ sales employees later replaced those names with intermediaries in third countries, on invoices, packing lists and bills of lading. Management knew the goods were for the DPRK and knew the nexus had been removed from the documents. See third-country transshipment and the China page.
The dollars
BMJ told customers to pay into its US dollar account at a non-US bank. That put 28 wire transfers through US banks between March 2016 and May 2018, including payments connected to shipments for a blocked North Korean person. OFAC treated that as BMJ causing US banks to deal in blocked property and to export financial services to the DPRK. See third-country bank accounts.
The penalty
Non-egregious and not self-disclosed, at $1.0 million against a $1.27 million base, with credit for cooperation and a remedial programme: a new compliance head reporting to the president, third-party screening, a written sanctions policy, know-your-customer escalation, and anti-diversion agreements for any trading company buying on behalf of end users. The payment was deemed satisfied by a larger payment to the Department of Justice.
What the record shows
- Editing names out of documents is the signature. The record does not show an outsider forging anything; it shows sales staff changing a customer name on request.
- The same exposure through a different product. Compare the British American Tobacco case: tobacco-related trade with the DPRK and US dollar clearing.
- OFAC points to its own Framework. It notes that non-US persons are repeatedly caught by causing US persons to take part, and that the risk is “particularly acute” with DPRK companies and those acting for them.