This is the page that explains what the rest of the site is doing.
The single organising principle
A well-built evasion scheme produces documents that are individually correct. The invoice is a real invoice, the company is really registered, the director really was appointed, the vessel really has that name today.
What cannot be made consistent is the relationship between records held by different parties, in different countries, for different purposes. Detection is the practice of putting two such records beside each other.
The five recurring methods
Comparison against a benchmark. An invoice price against a market price. A country’s imports against its industrial capacity. A freight rate against the published rate for the route. Where an independent measure of what something should be exists, the deviation is the finding.
Aggregate pattern analysis. A structure designed to be invisible in a single lookup is frequently obvious across a whole dataset — the director named on four hundred boards, the formation agent who built two hundred identical companies, the commodity code that collapsed while its neighbour tripled.
Physical corroboration. Documents assert; the world records. A vessel’s actual track, a terminal’s records, a recovered component’s part number, a satellite image. This is what resolves phantom shipments and at-sea transfers, and it is why the absence of transmitted data is itself evidence.
Relational linking. Fronts and shells are found through what they share with something already known: an address, a phone number, an email domain, an officer, a payment.
The internal record. In nearly every published case, somebody inside the organisation asked the right question. The document trail of how that question was answered, or closed without an answer, is what turns negligence into knowledge.
What none of this is
None of it is a single decisive test, and none of it produces certainty from one indicator. Every published red flag has an innocent explanation available. Their value is cumulative, and treating any one of them as proof is the characteristic error of amateur analysis in this field.